The Nigerian Academy of Science (NAS) has issued a strong call to action for all government levels. It urged a significant increase in investment for scientific research and innovation. The academy described science and technology as essential drivers of national growth and sustainable development. Consequently, this call comes amid growing concerns about the country’s developmental challenges.
This push for change is timely. For context, the Nigerian government has allocated about $1 billion to science in the 2026 budget . However, NAS argues that strategic investment must go beyond mere budget lines. Furthermore, the academy is advocating for a complete overhaul of governance structures in educational institutions.
The Case for Robust Science Funding
The academy stressed that financial commitment is the bedrock of progress. It pointed out that developed nations reached their status through deliberate scientific investment. Therefore, Nigeria must adopt a similar long-term strateg.
“Countries that have achieved sustained economic growth and technological competitiveness have done so through deliberate, long-term investment in science, robust research systems, and strong research institutions,” the academy stated.
It also clarified that funding must be holistic and sustainable. “Investments in science must extend beyond funding projects to include human resources capacity building, investment in research infrastructure, and strong institutional systems that underpin effective research and innovation,” the statement read. This approach is critical for solving national issues like public health and food security
Insistence on Merit for Institutional Governance
Beyond funding, NAS focused heavily on leadership quality. It declared that governing council appointments must be strictly merit-based. Preference should go to those with academic qualifications and proven governance experience. Consequently, this would ensure effective oversight and institutional credibility.
“The appointment of chairmen and external members of governing councils of universities and research institutions should be based strictly on merit, with preference given to individuals who possess relevant academic qualifications and demonstrable experience in the governance and administration of tertiary institutions,” NAS affirmed.
The academy also expressed concern over recent appointments of non-specialists to head research institutes. It argued that such roles require technical expertise and proven research credentials. Therefore, NAS urged that these specific appointments be reviewed and potentially reversed. This concern mirrors criticisms from academics who warn against the politicisation of specialised institutions.
Need for Due Process in Vice-Chancellor Selection
Similarly, the academy scrutinised the process of selecting university leaders. It raised a red flag over irregularities in some vice-chancellor appointments. NAS insisted on strict adherence to due process and established laws. This, it argued, would minimise controversies and ensure credible leadership.
“Institutional processes should follow due process and established procedures to ensure that decisions are merit-based, sustainable and credible,” the academy added. Notably, existing federal guidelines already mandate that a vice-chancellor must have 10 years of experience as a professor. NAS is essentially demanding that governments respect these existing rules.
In conclusion, the academy urged all governments to adopt its 2026 agenda. It believes that strengthening governance and investing in science will foster a national culture of excellence. Ultimately, this will build globally competitive institutions for Nigeria.